https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113840 Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 provides a 60-day period to appeal against a Company Law Board order and allows extension only up to a further 60 days on sufficient cause. Treating that provision as a special limitation scheme, the Madras High Court applied express exclusion under section 29(2) of the Limitation Act and the statutory bar created by the words limiting extension. It held that section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot be used to extend time beyond the additional 60 days. As the delay exceeded that ceiling, condonation was refused. en-us Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113840 Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 provides a 60-day period to appeal against a Company Law Board order and allows extension only up to a further 60 days on sufficient cause. Treating that provision as a special limitation scheme, the Madras High Court applied express exclusion under section 29(2) of the Limitation Act and the statutory bar created by the words limiting extension. It held that section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot be used to extend time beyond the additional 60 days. As the delay exceeded that ceiling, condonation was refused. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113840