<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 784 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113837</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application under section 468 of the Companies Act, finding it lacked merit. The liquidator failed to prove the respondent&#039;s liability for remitting Rs. 80,76,906 to the company in liquidation. The court suggested pursuing claims against third parties involved in illegal mining activities, as evidence did not link the respondent to the misappropriated amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 784 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113837</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application under section 468 of the Companies Act, finding it lacked merit. The liquidator failed to prove the respondent&#039;s liability for remitting Rs. 80,76,906 to the company in liquidation. The court suggested pursuing claims against third parties involved in illegal mining activities, as evidence did not link the respondent to the misappropriated amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>