https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113827 An order directing reconsideration of revival under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 must be read purposively to facilitate assessment of revival proposals, and not as confining consideration to persons already party to earlier proceedings. The BIFR may evaluate proposals from any source if they assist revival. Questions about the locus of a union to represent workmen before the BIFR fall within the Board's own jurisdiction and cannot be decided by the company or operating agency. The BIFR was also entitled to proceed under the revival framework, and the appellate authority's restrictive view was set aside. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113827 An order directing reconsideration of revival under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 must be read purposively to facilitate assessment of revival proposals, and not as confining consideration to persons already party to earlier proceedings. The BIFR may evaluate proposals from any source if they assist revival. Questions about the locus of a union to represent workmen before the BIFR fall within the Board's own jurisdiction and cannot be decided by the company or operating agency. The BIFR was also entitled to proceed under the revival framework, and the appellate authority's restrictive view was set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113827