<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 592 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113799</link>
    <description>An admitted balance confirmation and matching dishonoured cheques were treated as strong evidence of liability, and the company&#039;s inconsistent objections on rates, debit notes, security cheques and prior correspondence failed to rebut the presumption that the cheques were issued for consideration. On that basis, the winding-up petition was admitted for the admitted debt with interest and costs. The Court also found prima facie that the company&#039;s affidavit and supporting documents were false, inconsistent and possibly fabricated or forged, and directed criminal complaint proceedings for false evidence and fabrication of documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 592 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113799</link>
      <description>An admitted balance confirmation and matching dishonoured cheques were treated as strong evidence of liability, and the company&#039;s inconsistent objections on rates, debit notes, security cheques and prior correspondence failed to rebut the presumption that the cheques were issued for consideration. On that basis, the winding-up petition was admitted for the admitted debt with interest and costs. The Court also found prima facie that the company&#039;s affidavit and supporting documents were false, inconsistent and possibly fabricated or forged, and directed criminal complaint proceedings for false evidence and fabrication of documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>