https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113786 The court concluded that the appellants did not establish a prima facie case for winding up the company on just and equitable grounds. The appeal lacked merit as the interests of the petitioners, holding only 4% of shares, did not outweigh those of the majority shareholders and the company. The learned Single Judge's dismissal of the petition was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113786 The court concluded that the appellants did not establish a prima facie case for winding up the company on just and equitable grounds. The appeal lacked merit as the interests of the petitioners, holding only 4% of shares, did not outweigh those of the majority shareholders and the company. The learned Single Judge's dismissal of the petition was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113786