<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 557 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the stay order, dispensing with the pre-deposit condition and proceeding with the appeals. The main issue was the admissibility of Modvat credit for duty paid on HDPE granules used in manufacturing HDPE pipes. The Tribunal found no evidence supporting the Department&#039;s allegations of using non-specified granules intentionally, highlighted the absence of motive, and noted the relevance of expert clarification. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside the impugned orders based on genuine transactions and Modvat credit on purchased inputs, ultimately disposing of the modification application and stay petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:19:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 557 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the stay order, dispensing with the pre-deposit condition and proceeding with the appeals. The main issue was the admissibility of Modvat credit for duty paid on HDPE granules used in manufacturing HDPE pipes. The Tribunal found no evidence supporting the Department&#039;s allegations of using non-specified granules intentionally, highlighted the absence of motive, and noted the relevance of expert clarification. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside the impugned orders based on genuine transactions and Modvat credit on purchased inputs, ultimately disposing of the modification application and stay petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>