https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113778 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to quash a criminal complaint where the accused's role in the company, and any resulting vicarious liability, turns on disputed facts. If the complaint and accompanying material prima facie indicate that a person may have been in charge of, or responsible for, the company's business, the question must be decided at trial. A person need not be a director to face liability if the material suggests control, including directions to the board or involvement in day-to-day affairs. Where the alleged SEBI contravention is continuing, liability cannot be excluded at the threshold. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113778 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to quash a criminal complaint where the accused's role in the company, and any resulting vicarious liability, turns on disputed facts. If the complaint and accompanying material prima facie indicate that a person may have been in charge of, or responsible for, the company's business, the question must be decided at trial. A person need not be a director to face liability if the material suggests control, including directions to the board or involvement in day-to-day affairs. Where the alleged SEBI contravention is continuing, liability cannot be excluded at the threshold. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113778