https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113774 A company whose name had been struck off from the register was restored under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 because the Court was satisfied that restoration was just and proper on the facts placed before it. The petition relied on the cessation of the circumstances that had led to non-commencement of business and closure of activities, together with the interest of the company and its shareholders. In the absence of opposition from the Registrar, the Court directed restoration of the company's name in the register as if it had never been struck off, subject to delivery of a certified copy under rule 93 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 May 2012 13:19:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113774 A company whose name had been struck off from the register was restored under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 because the Court was satisfied that restoration was just and proper on the facts placed before it. The petition relied on the cessation of the circumstances that had led to non-commencement of business and closure of activities, together with the interest of the company and its shareholders. In the absence of opposition from the Registrar, the Court directed restoration of the company's name in the register as if it had never been struck off, subject to delivery of a certified copy under rule 93 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113774