<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 533 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113751</link>
    <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined in a stay application because the applicants did not show a strong prima facie case or adequate financial hardship. The demand rested on audited balance sheets, employee statements and other departmental material, and the applicants&#039; explanation about timber sales was not accepted at the prima facie stage. The plea of natural justice based on denial of cross-examination also failed, as the relied-upon statements had been supplied and cross-examination is not an absolute right in departmental proceedings. Partial relief was granted, with deposit directed as a condition for continuation of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 533 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113751</link>
      <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined in a stay application because the applicants did not show a strong prima facie case or adequate financial hardship. The demand rested on audited balance sheets, employee statements and other departmental material, and the applicants&#039; explanation about timber sales was not accepted at the prima facie stage. The plea of natural justice based on denial of cross-examination also failed, as the relied-upon statements had been supplied and cross-examination is not an absolute right in departmental proceedings. Partial relief was granted, with deposit directed as a condition for continuation of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>