<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 491 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal and ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the importance of evidence in determining the validity of modvat credit claims. The decision was based on the dismissal of allegations against M/s. Calcutta Trades Corporation (CTC) by the Tribunal and High Court, leading to the conclusion that the respondents, as beneficiaries of CTC&#039;s invoices, should not be penalized for irregularities in CTC&#039;s invoices. The Tribunal highlighted the need to consider evidence of input receipt along with invoices in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:00:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 491 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal and ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the importance of evidence in determining the validity of modvat credit claims. The decision was based on the dismissal of allegations against M/s. Calcutta Trades Corporation (CTC) by the Tribunal and High Court, leading to the conclusion that the respondents, as beneficiaries of CTC&#039;s invoices, should not be penalized for irregularities in CTC&#039;s invoices. The Tribunal highlighted the need to consider evidence of input receipt along with invoices in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>