<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 588 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113733</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied solely because the declaration was filed late or was initially deficient, where the governing rule and binding precedent permitted the benefit even in pending appeals; the credit issue on delayed declaration was therefore allowed. By contrast, a denial of credit on original invoices without recorded reasons was not final and required fresh examination by the original authority after giving the assessee an opportunity to substantiate the claim; that issue was remanded for de novo consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 588 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113733</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied solely because the declaration was filed late or was initially deficient, where the governing rule and binding precedent permitted the benefit even in pending appeals; the credit issue on delayed declaration was therefore allowed. By contrast, a denial of credit on original invoices without recorded reasons was not final and required fresh examination by the original authority after giving the assessee an opportunity to substantiate the claim; that issue was remanded for de novo consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>