<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 571 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113715</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai addressed the classification issue of a Tata Sumo Ambulance under different CET headings and the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty demand. The Tribunal found the classification dispute to be contentious, with no strong prima facie case for waiver, and directed a partial pre-deposit to stay the recovery pending appeal. Compliance with the pre-deposit directive was crucial to maintain the stay on recovery and appeal dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 571 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113715</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai addressed the classification issue of a Tata Sumo Ambulance under different CET headings and the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty demand. The Tribunal found the classification dispute to be contentious, with no strong prima facie case for waiver, and directed a partial pre-deposit to stay the recovery pending appeal. Compliance with the pre-deposit directive was crucial to maintain the stay on recovery and appeal dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>