https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113709 The tribunal determined that the appellant was producing cross reel hanks yarn, upheld the examination report's reliability despite sample packing issues, and rejected total exemption from pre-deposit due to financial difficulties. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs towards the duty liability of Rs. 2.70 crores within two months, with the balance amount of demand and penalty stayed, striking a balance between the appellant's financial challenges and duty liability. Compliance with the directive was required within the specified timeframe. en-us Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 May 2012 18:15:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113709 The tribunal determined that the appellant was producing cross reel hanks yarn, upheld the examination report's reliability despite sample packing issues, and rejected total exemption from pre-deposit due to financial difficulties. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs towards the duty liability of Rs. 2.70 crores within two months, with the balance amount of demand and penalty stayed, striking a balance between the appellant's financial challenges and duty liability. Compliance with the directive was required within the specified timeframe. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113709