<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 561 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113705</link>
    <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit arose where the supplier had already discharged the entire duty liability under the Compounded Levy Scheme with interest, weakening the objection that inputs suffered inadequate duty payment. On the material placed, the Tribunal found the demand and penalty arising from denial of deemed credit to be unsustainable at the interim stage, and recovery was stayed pending appeal with pre-deposit of duty and penalty waived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 561 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113705</link>
      <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit arose where the supplier had already discharged the entire duty liability under the Compounded Levy Scheme with interest, weakening the objection that inputs suffered inadequate duty payment. On the material placed, the Tribunal found the demand and penalty arising from denial of deemed credit to be unsustainable at the interim stage, and recovery was stayed pending appeal with pre-deposit of duty and penalty waived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>