<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 663 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113687</link>
    <description>Where clandestine removal and deliberate evasion of duty are found on the basis of shortages detected by excise officers, subsequent debit of duty after detection does not make the statutory penalty under Rule 173Q inapplicable. The explanation offered for the shortages was unsupported, and the later payment was treated as non-voluntary because it followed departmental detection. On those facts, the penalty provision was attracted and its deletion was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 663 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113687</link>
      <description>Where clandestine removal and deliberate evasion of duty are found on the basis of shortages detected by excise officers, subsequent debit of duty after detection does not make the statutory penalty under Rule 173Q inapplicable. The explanation offered for the shortages was unsupported, and the later payment was treated as non-voluntary because it followed departmental detection. On those facts, the penalty provision was attracted and its deletion was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>