<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 627 - CESTAT, kolkata</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that Modvat credit should not be included in the assessable value of the final product. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was overturned due to lack of evidence supporting the inclusion and the unjustified extension of the limitation period. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to settled legal principles and respecting previous Tribunal decisions in similar matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:24:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 627 - CESTAT, kolkata</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that Modvat credit should not be included in the assessable value of the final product. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was overturned due to lack of evidence supporting the inclusion and the unjustified extension of the limitation period. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to settled legal principles and respecting previous Tribunal decisions in similar matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>