<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1160 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113657</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Department&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and restoring the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision. The judgment clarified the interpretation of exemption Notification 175/86, addressed duty demands on clearances exceeding Rs. 30 lakhs, resolved conflicting Tribunal decisions on &quot;first clearances,&quot; and affirmed the binding precedent established by the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 14:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1160 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113657</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Department&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and restoring the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision. The judgment clarified the interpretation of exemption Notification 175/86, addressed duty demands on clearances exceeding Rs. 30 lakhs, resolved conflicting Tribunal decisions on &quot;first clearances,&quot; and affirmed the binding precedent established by the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>