<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 917 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113652</link>
    <description>Assessable value of finished goods cannot be enhanced merely by alleging that raw materials were deliberately undervalued through collusion. Contemporaneous invoices, disclosed higher duty-paid and discounted sale values, and Modvat credit records supported the declared purchase price and negated concealment or suppression. Where returns and invoices were regularly furnished, the extended limitation period cannot apply without proof of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. Interest and penalty provisions cannot be applied retrospectively to duty liabilities arising before their commencement. The demand for duty, interest, and penalties was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 14:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 917 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113652</link>
      <description>Assessable value of finished goods cannot be enhanced merely by alleging that raw materials were deliberately undervalued through collusion. Contemporaneous invoices, disclosed higher duty-paid and discounted sale values, and Modvat credit records supported the declared purchase price and negated concealment or suppression. Where returns and invoices were regularly furnished, the extended limitation period cannot apply without proof of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. Interest and penalty provisions cannot be applied retrospectively to duty liabilities arising before their commencement. The demand for duty, interest, and penalties was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>