<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 628 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113641</link>
    <description>An exemption notification covering excisable goods manufactured in a factory workshop and used in the same factory for repairs or maintenance of machinery was applied according to its plain terms, and the scope of &quot;maintenance&quot; was treated broadly enough to include goods used for proper working of the machinery; the Revenue&#039;s objection failed. The retrospective exemption law was then applied to deem Notification No. 281/86-C.E. effective from 1-3-1986, because it fell within the statutory scheme for notifications issued between 3-3-1986 and 8-8-1986. The exemption was therefore upheld and the assessee obtained retrospective benefit from 1-3-1986.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 13:10:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 628 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113641</link>
      <description>An exemption notification covering excisable goods manufactured in a factory workshop and used in the same factory for repairs or maintenance of machinery was applied according to its plain terms, and the scope of &quot;maintenance&quot; was treated broadly enough to include goods used for proper working of the machinery; the Revenue&#039;s objection failed. The retrospective exemption law was then applied to deem Notification No. 281/86-C.E. effective from 1-3-1986, because it fell within the statutory scheme for notifications issued between 3-3-1986 and 8-8-1986. The exemption was therefore upheld and the assessee obtained retrospective benefit from 1-3-1986.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>