<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 466 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113630</link>
    <description>The Judge upheld the order of the Collector with modifications, reducing the penalty from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000 and the redemption fine from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 5,000. The dispute over the stage of the goods was acknowledged, leading to a penalty for improper account maintenance. The Judge deemed the initial penalty and fine reasonable, adjusting them accordingly and disposing of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 466 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113630</link>
      <description>The Judge upheld the order of the Collector with modifications, reducing the penalty from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000 and the redemption fine from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 5,000. The dispute over the stage of the goods was acknowledged, leading to a penalty for improper account maintenance. The Judge deemed the initial penalty and fine reasonable, adjusting them accordingly and disposing of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>