<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 526 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113600</link>
    <description>A foreign decree relied on in Indian proceedings remains subject to the statutory exceptions governing foreign judgments, including lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice and fraud, so those objections may be examined rather than rejected at the threshold. A certified copy of the foreign judgment is required before the statutory presumption as to competency and genuineness of the foreign court record can arise, and that presumption is rebuttable. The provisions on foreign judgments and foreign judicial records operate together: one governs conclusiveness, the other proof and presumption. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication of the objections and supporting evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 526 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113600</link>
      <description>A foreign decree relied on in Indian proceedings remains subject to the statutory exceptions governing foreign judgments, including lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice and fraud, so those objections may be examined rather than rejected at the threshold. A certified copy of the foreign judgment is required before the statutory presumption as to competency and genuineness of the foreign court record can arise, and that presumption is rebuttable. The provisions on foreign judgments and foreign judicial records operate together: one governs conclusiveness, the other proof and presumption. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication of the objections and supporting evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>