<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 508 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs Authorities&#039; valuation method for customs duty on imported goods, emphasizing deliberate concealment and reducing the redemption fine to Rs. 60 lakhs from the original amount. The Tribunal found the import offense deliberate, with significant duty evasion, justifying adverse inferences due to concealment of information. The modified redemption fine aimed to deter fraudulent activities, aligning with the Indian market value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 18:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 508 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs Authorities&#039; valuation method for customs duty on imported goods, emphasizing deliberate concealment and reducing the redemption fine to Rs. 60 lakhs from the original amount. The Tribunal found the import offense deliberate, with significant duty evasion, justifying adverse inferences due to concealment of information. The modified redemption fine aimed to deter fraudulent activities, aligning with the Indian market value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>