<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 521 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113585</link>
    <description>The court rejected the approval of the demerger scheme, finding it prejudicial to creditors and shareholders. The scheme did not comply with statutory provisions under the Companies Act, as proper meetings were not convened, and necessary resolutions were missing. The court emphasized the importance of safeguarding the interests of all parties in corporate restructuring and upheld the dismissal of the appeal, affirming the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 521 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113585</link>
      <description>The court rejected the approval of the demerger scheme, finding it prejudicial to creditors and shareholders. The scheme did not comply with statutory provisions under the Companies Act, as proper meetings were not convened, and necessary resolutions were missing. The court emphasized the importance of safeguarding the interests of all parties in corporate restructuring and upheld the dismissal of the appeal, affirming the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>