https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113582 Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 preserves appeals subject to the same conditions as appeals from orders in the court's ordinary jurisdiction, and that wording regulates procedure rather than extinguishing the substantive right of appeal. However, section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 creates an express bar on any further appeal where a Single Judge has heard and decided an appeal from an original or appellate order, and this bar extends to appeals under other laws in force. Because the Single Judge had decided the matter in appellate jurisdiction under Rule 164 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, the further intra-court appeal was held barred and dismissed as not maintainable. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113582 Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 preserves appeals subject to the same conditions as appeals from orders in the court's ordinary jurisdiction, and that wording regulates procedure rather than extinguishing the substantive right of appeal. However, section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 creates an express bar on any further appeal where a Single Judge has heard and decided an appeal from an original or appellate order, and this bar extends to appeals under other laws in force. Because the Single Judge had decided the matter in appellate jurisdiction under Rule 164 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, the further intra-court appeal was held barred and dismissed as not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113582