https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113579 An application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be rejected merely because the original arbitration agreement or a certified copy was not filed when the existence of the arbitration clause is admitted and the document is in the opposite party's possession. The Company Law Board's refusal on that ground was legally unsustainable because the application was not considered on merits. The rejection was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration on merits. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 May 2012 18:24:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113579 An application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be rejected merely because the original arbitration agreement or a certified copy was not filed when the existence of the arbitration clause is admitted and the document is in the opposite party's possession. The Company Law Board's refusal on that ground was legally unsustainable because the application was not considered on merits. The rejection was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113579