https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113575 The court found that the petitioner did not qualify as a contributory of Polaris under Section 439(4)(b) but had valid grounds for winding up Polaris and Falcon under clauses (c), (e), and (f) of Section 433. The statutory notice served by the petitioner was deemed valid. As a result, the court admitted the winding-up petitions, with instructions for advertisement and deposit of publication charges. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113575 The court found that the petitioner did not qualify as a contributory of Polaris under Section 439(4)(b) but had valid grounds for winding up Polaris and Falcon under clauses (c), (e), and (f) of Section 433. The statutory notice served by the petitioner was deemed valid. As a result, the court admitted the winding-up petitions, with instructions for advertisement and deposit of publication charges. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113575