https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113571 A retracted confession recorded under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act could not, by itself, sustain framing of charge where the prosecution failed to prove voluntariness or rebut the allegation of coercion. The Delhi HC held that substantial independent corroboration is required before such a statement can be relied on for criminal or quasi-criminal proceedings. In the absence of cogent corroborative material, the order framing charge was unsustainable and the revision petitions were allowed. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 May 2012 18:15:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113571 A retracted confession recorded under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act could not, by itself, sustain framing of charge where the prosecution failed to prove voluntariness or rebut the allegation of coercion. The Delhi HC held that substantial independent corroboration is required before such a statement can be relied on for criminal or quasi-criminal proceedings. In the absence of cogent corroborative material, the order framing charge was unsustainable and the revision petitions were allowed. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113571