<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 513 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113570</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order for possession and rejecting the application for stay due to lack of justification. The court directed the payment made by the company to be adjusted towards the creditor&#039;s claim, emphasizing adherence to legal principles and transparency in such applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 513 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113570</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order for possession and rejecting the application for stay due to lack of justification. The court directed the payment made by the company to be adjusted towards the creditor&#039;s claim, emphasizing adherence to legal principles and transparency in such applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>