<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 497 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113569</link>
    <description>The appellants successfully sought retention of the file within the jurisdiction of the Bench. The Tribunal directed the appellants to pre-deposit Rs. 45 lakhs for the appeal hearing, with the balance of duty waived and recovery stayed until appeal disposal. The Tribunal noted the appellants&#039; argument regarding the high commercial value and quantity levels of their imports but ultimately upheld the loading of value by 17.83% instead of 20%. The appellants were allowed to apply for an early hearing of the appeal after meeting the pre-deposit obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 18:12:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 497 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113569</link>
      <description>The appellants successfully sought retention of the file within the jurisdiction of the Bench. The Tribunal directed the appellants to pre-deposit Rs. 45 lakhs for the appeal hearing, with the balance of duty waived and recovery stayed until appeal disposal. The Tribunal noted the appellants&#039; argument regarding the high commercial value and quantity levels of their imports but ultimately upheld the loading of value by 17.83% instead of 20%. The appellants were allowed to apply for an early hearing of the appeal after meeting the pre-deposit obligation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>