https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113562 The Court quashed the Registrar's order striking off the petitioner-company's name from the Register of Companies due to non-compliance with section 560(3) of the Companies Act, 1956. The company, despite omissions in filing returns, was found to be operational, leading to the restoration of its name in the Register. The Court directed the company to file all pending statutory returns within three months and preserved enforceable rights existing before the Registrar's order, with the limitation period not running until the judgment date. Compliance with statutory requirements and ensuring continuous business operation were highlighted as crucial. en-us Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113562 The Court quashed the Registrar's order striking off the petitioner-company's name from the Register of Companies due to non-compliance with section 560(3) of the Companies Act, 1956. The company, despite omissions in filing returns, was found to be operational, leading to the restoration of its name in the Register. The Court directed the company to file all pending statutory returns within three months and preserved enforceable rights existing before the Registrar's order, with the limitation period not running until the judgment date. Compliance with statutory requirements and ensuring continuous business operation were highlighted as crucial. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113562