<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 491 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113557</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai granted a waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 1,16,84,066/- and an equal penalty arising from a demand order by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur. The Tribunal considered the statutory benefit under the advance license scheme, distinguishing it from a case where additional consideration is received from the buyer. Relying on a previous order, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver, disagreeing with the Commissioner&#039;s reliance on a different case law. As a result, the Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit of duty and penalty, halting the recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 17:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 491 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113557</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai granted a waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 1,16,84,066/- and an equal penalty arising from a demand order by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur. The Tribunal considered the statutory benefit under the advance license scheme, distinguishing it from a case where additional consideration is received from the buyer. Relying on a previous order, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver, disagreeing with the Commissioner&#039;s reliance on a different case law. As a result, the Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit of duty and penalty, halting the recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>