<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 472 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of appeals due to lack of signatures on appeal forms, remanding the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration on the merits. The appellant&#039;s submission of additional signed copies led to the finding that the dismissal was unsustainable, emphasizing the curability of such defects and the need to provide the appellant an opportunity to rectify procedural issues before dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 16:47:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 472 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of appeals due to lack of signatures on appeal forms, remanding the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration on the merits. The appellant&#039;s submission of additional signed copies led to the finding that the dismissal was unsustainable, emphasizing the curability of such defects and the need to provide the appellant an opportunity to rectify procedural issues before dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>