<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 478 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113518</link>
    <description>In an appeal against denial of Modvat credit, interim stay and waiver of pre-deposit were considered pending disposal of the challenge. The order noted that the appellant had not satisfactorily explained the loss of the duplicate invoice copy and had taken credit before installation of the capital goods, so complete waiver was not granted. A partial pre-deposit was directed as a condition for interim relief. On compliance, recovery of the balance duty and the entire penalty was stayed for the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 16:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 478 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113518</link>
      <description>In an appeal against denial of Modvat credit, interim stay and waiver of pre-deposit were considered pending disposal of the challenge. The order noted that the appellant had not satisfactorily explained the loss of the duplicate invoice copy and had taken credit before installation of the capital goods, so complete waiver was not granted. A partial pre-deposit was directed as a condition for interim relief. On compliance, recovery of the balance duty and the entire penalty was stayed for the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>