<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 473 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the condonation of a 50-day delay in filing the appeal, citing lack of authorization for the Assistant Manager to file the appeal, absence of supporting documentation, and failure to establish valid reasons for the delay. The appeal was dismissed based on the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the application lacked merit and did not align with relevant Supreme Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 16:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 473 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the condonation of a 50-day delay in filing the appeal, citing lack of authorization for the Assistant Manager to file the appeal, absence of supporting documentation, and failure to establish valid reasons for the delay. The appeal was dismissed based on the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the application lacked merit and did not align with relevant Supreme Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>