<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 466 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s stay application regarding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order on Modvat credit for capital goods received before 16-3-95. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s justification, based on a pending reference application before the High Court, insufficient. The Commissioner (Appeals) had correctly followed a Larger Bench judgment, making a stay unnecessary. The appeal was set to proceed for hearing without a stay of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 15:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 466 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s stay application regarding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order on Modvat credit for capital goods received before 16-3-95. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s justification, based on a pending reference application before the High Court, insufficient. The Commissioner (Appeals) had correctly followed a Larger Bench judgment, making a stay unnecessary. The appeal was set to proceed for hearing without a stay of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>