<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 465 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order for confiscation of imported goods. It was held that the goods, covered by a valid carnet and meeting exemption requirements under Clause 3(P) of the Foreign Trade Order, were not subject to confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized that goods temporarily imported for specific events, even if not cleared by Customs due to administrative formalities, are exempt from confiscation and licensing requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 15:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 465 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order for confiscation of imported goods. It was held that the goods, covered by a valid carnet and meeting exemption requirements under Clause 3(P) of the Foreign Trade Order, were not subject to confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized that goods temporarily imported for specific events, even if not cleared by Customs due to administrative formalities, are exempt from confiscation and licensing requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>