<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 464 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113496</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the delay in filing the appeal was a direct result of the delay in receiving the Order-in-Original. Despite proactive efforts by the appellant&#039;s Counsel to obtain the order, the department&#039;s delayed response was deemed unreasonable. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had not received the order promptly, leading to the delayed appeal filing. As a result, the appeal was deemed timely, and the case was disposed of with a hearing scheduled for a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 15:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 464 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113496</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the delay in filing the appeal was a direct result of the delay in receiving the Order-in-Original. Despite proactive efforts by the appellant&#039;s Counsel to obtain the order, the department&#039;s delayed response was deemed unreasonable. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had not received the order promptly, leading to the delayed appeal filing. As a result, the appeal was deemed timely, and the case was disposed of with a hearing scheduled for a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>