https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113488 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision to entertain a petition under Article 227, emphasizing that the Consumer Protection Act provides for appeals and revisions, rendering the High Court's intervention inappropriate. The Court directed a fresh adjudication, instructing the High Court to assess the availability of an alternative remedy for the respondent and consider recalling the National Commission's order if necessary. The appellant's application for recall was dismissed without proper examination, leading to a remittance of the matter for reconsideration. en-us Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113488 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision to entertain a petition under Article 227, emphasizing that the Consumer Protection Act provides for appeals and revisions, rendering the High Court's intervention inappropriate. The Court directed a fresh adjudication, instructing the High Court to assess the availability of an alternative remedy for the respondent and consider recalling the National Commission's order if necessary. The appellant's application for recall was dismissed without proper examination, leading to a remittance of the matter for reconsideration. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113488