<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 285 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113484</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between a West Bengal-based petitioner-company and a Tamil Nadu-based transferor-company, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the petitioner. The court directed publication of notices, compliance with the Regional Director&#039;s observations, and High Court of Madras&#039; sanction. Shareholders of the transferor-company would not receive shares of the petitioner-company post-amalgamation. With no opposition, the court approved the petition, safeguarded employees&#039; interests, and instructed compliance with specified procedures within Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 19:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 285 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113484</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between a West Bengal-based petitioner-company and a Tamil Nadu-based transferor-company, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the petitioner. The court directed publication of notices, compliance with the Regional Director&#039;s observations, and High Court of Madras&#039; sanction. Shareholders of the transferor-company would not receive shares of the petitioner-company post-amalgamation. With no opposition, the court approved the petition, safeguarded employees&#039; interests, and instructed compliance with specified procedures within Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>