<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 450 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113468</link>
    <description>Entitlement to total waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was rejected because the appellants had not established a prima facie case for complete waiver. The Tribunal granted only partial relief by directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 25,000 within six weeks, while waiving the balance duty and the entire penalty subject to compliance. Stay of recovery was made operative only after the directed deposit was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 14:32:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 450 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113468</link>
      <description>Entitlement to total waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was rejected because the appellants had not established a prima facie case for complete waiver. The Tribunal granted only partial relief by directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 25,000 within six weeks, while waiving the balance duty and the entire penalty subject to compliance. Stay of recovery was made operative only after the directed deposit was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>