<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 327 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113461</link>
    <description>The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim for payment in a business transaction due to the lack of clear evidence regarding the exact amount owed by the respondent. The court emphasized the absence of material evidence such as invoices or contracts for the supply of materials, making it difficult to determine the precise sum owed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 14:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 327 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113461</link>
      <description>The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim for payment in a business transaction due to the lack of clear evidence regarding the exact amount owed by the respondent. The court emphasized the absence of material evidence such as invoices or contracts for the supply of materials, making it difficult to determine the precise sum owed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>