https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113458 Restoration of a struck-off company name under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 depends on whether revival is justified in the interests of justice and whether the statutory conditions are satisfied. The company's long failure to file annual returns and balance sheets, together with non-intimation of its registered office change, weighed against its claim of continued activity. Restoration was nevertheless considered appropriate because the respondent did not oppose it, subject to filing all outstanding statutory documents, paying applicable fees, and bearing exemplary costs, including costs payable to the Registrar of Companies. en-us Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113458 Restoration of a struck-off company name under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 depends on whether revival is justified in the interests of justice and whether the statutory conditions are satisfied. The company's long failure to file annual returns and balance sheets, together with non-intimation of its registered office change, weighed against its claim of continued activity. Restoration was nevertheless considered appropriate because the respondent did not oppose it, subject to filing all outstanding statutory documents, paying applicable fees, and bearing exemplary costs, including costs payable to the Registrar of Companies. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113458