<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 323 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113457</link>
    <description>A struck-off company may be restored to the Register where restoration is just or where the company was still carrying on business, held substantial assets, or had pending litigation that should be brought to conclusion. The Court treated ownership of immovable property and related proceedings as supporting revival, but found repeated failures to file statutory returns, balance sheets, and office-change intimations to show casual compliance. Restoration was therefore granted only on strict conditions, including exemplary costs and full compliance with outstanding statutory filings and formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 323 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113457</link>
      <description>A struck-off company may be restored to the Register where restoration is just or where the company was still carrying on business, held substantial assets, or had pending litigation that should be brought to conclusion. The Court treated ownership of immovable property and related proceedings as supporting revival, but found repeated failures to file statutory returns, balance sheets, and office-change intimations to show casual compliance. Restoration was therefore granted only on strict conditions, including exemplary costs and full compliance with outstanding statutory filings and formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>