<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 472 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113456</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit relief was considered where duty and penalty arose from alleged storage loss of molasses. A Board circular was relied upon to indicate that storage variation up to 2% was permissible, and the Commissioner (Appeals) had already recorded that the loss fell within that limit. On that basis, the claimed demand was treated as suitable for waiver at the pre-deposit stage, and pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 13:25:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 472 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113456</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit relief was considered where duty and penalty arose from alleged storage loss of molasses. A Board circular was relied upon to indicate that storage variation up to 2% was permissible, and the Commissioner (Appeals) had already recorded that the loss fell within that limit. On that basis, the claimed demand was treated as suitable for waiver at the pre-deposit stage, and pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>