<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 405 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113446</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the applicant company&#039;s application seeking to recover outstanding dues from the respondent trade debtor. Despite the winding-up order, the court found the applicant failed to provide sufficient legal evidence to establish the debt claim of Rs. 1,73,175 with interest. The court highlighted discrepancies in the presented documents and emphasized the need for substantial proof. As a result, the court ruled against the recovery of the outstanding dues, ultimately dismissing the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 13:14:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 405 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113446</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the applicant company&#039;s application seeking to recover outstanding dues from the respondent trade debtor. Despite the winding-up order, the court found the applicant failed to provide sufficient legal evidence to establish the debt claim of Rs. 1,73,175 with interest. The court highlighted discrepancies in the presented documents and emphasized the need for substantial proof. As a result, the court ruled against the recovery of the outstanding dues, ultimately dismissing the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>