<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 401 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113442</link>
    <description>A company in liquidation was dissolved under section 481 because the winding up had been pending for a long period, the available assets had already been dealt with, proceedings against the ex-directors had concluded, and only a small deposit balance remained with the Official Liquidator. The Court held that continuing the liquidation would serve no useful purpose, as there was no realistic prospect of recovery of debts or any further beneficial claim. It therefore dispensed with further liquidation steps and directed dissolution, with the Official Liquidator to file the prescribed report with the Registrar of Companies under section 481(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 401 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113442</link>
      <description>A company in liquidation was dissolved under section 481 because the winding up had been pending for a long period, the available assets had already been dealt with, proceedings against the ex-directors had concluded, and only a small deposit balance remained with the Official Liquidator. The Court held that continuing the liquidation would serve no useful purpose, as there was no realistic prospect of recovery of debts or any further beneficial claim. It therefore dispensed with further liquidation steps and directed dissolution, with the Official Liquidator to file the prescribed report with the Registrar of Companies under section 481(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>