<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 396 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113433</link>
    <description>Where a landlord&#039;s eviction right had already crystallized into a confirmed decree before amalgamation, the transferee company could continue and enforce the proceedings if the amalgamation scheme preserved pending suits, appeals and revisions. The article states that such amalgamation does not extinguish the landlord&#039;s accrued rights under rent control and property law. It further notes that subsequent events in revision do not automatically displace a finding of bona fide requirement, particularly where the landlord&#039;s need continues and no factual foundation supports a plea based on other properties. The stated legal effect is that eviction remains enforceable notwithstanding the merger.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 396 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113433</link>
      <description>Where a landlord&#039;s eviction right had already crystallized into a confirmed decree before amalgamation, the transferee company could continue and enforce the proceedings if the amalgamation scheme preserved pending suits, appeals and revisions. The article states that such amalgamation does not extinguish the landlord&#039;s accrued rights under rent control and property law. It further notes that subsequent events in revision do not automatically displace a finding of bona fide requirement, particularly where the landlord&#039;s need continues and no factual foundation supports a plea based on other properties. The stated legal effect is that eviction remains enforceable notwithstanding the merger.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>