<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 392 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113425</link>
    <description>Compensation awarded under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is treated as an important sentencing component aimed at victim restitution. The statutory scheme of Sections 357(3), 421 and 431 supports enforcement of such compensation in the same manner as a fine, including through a default sentence for non-payment. In fixing compensation and any default term, the court must keep both the amount and enforcement mechanism reasonable, considering the nature of the offence and the accused&#039;s capacity to pay. The text also notes that correction of the amount already deposited affects only the balance payable, with no further interference absent justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 392 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113425</link>
      <description>Compensation awarded under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is treated as an important sentencing component aimed at victim restitution. The statutory scheme of Sections 357(3), 421 and 431 supports enforcement of such compensation in the same manner as a fine, including through a default sentence for non-payment. In fixing compensation and any default term, the court must keep both the amount and enforcement mechanism reasonable, considering the nature of the offence and the accused&#039;s capacity to pay. The text also notes that correction of the amount already deposited affects only the balance payable, with no further interference absent justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>