<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 457 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113424</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai partially allowed the appeal on the confiscation of cargo on vessel S.S. Pravdinsk under the Customs Act, 1962. The fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 10,000 respectively due to the violation of Section 32 regarding the filing of the Import General Manifest after unloading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 12:34:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 457 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113424</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai partially allowed the appeal on the confiscation of cargo on vessel S.S. Pravdinsk under the Customs Act, 1962. The fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 10,000 respectively due to the violation of Section 32 regarding the filing of the Import General Manifest after unloading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>