https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113423 SC upheld the conviction for dishonour of cheque, finding a prima facie legally enforceable debt or liability arising from funds used for construction. The accused admitted the signature on the cheque, activating the statutory presumption under s.139 and the benefit of s.118(a); the presumption was not successfully rebutted by the defence. The High Court's conviction was therefore affirmed and the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the final order. en-us Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113423 SC upheld the conviction for dishonour of cheque, finding a prima facie legally enforceable debt or liability arising from funds used for construction. The accused admitted the signature on the cheque, activating the statutory presumption under s.139 and the benefit of s.118(a); the presumption was not successfully rebutted by the defence. The High Court's conviction was therefore affirmed and the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the final order. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113423